![]() ![]() ![]() The overall song dynamics were preserved and the bass wasn't hyped. ![]() The auto-mastered version was a little louder (-14.5 ave. A/Bing the original and AAMS versions, there wasn't a huge difference between them. Like LANDR, you can't specify a LUFS target. The good news is that AAMS chose very subtle changes, which is what you'd hope for on an already-mastered file. Then I was given a report that compared my master against a generic "progressive rock" reference (one of 700 references provided) and multiple reports showing what it had done. When I looked in the folder, it had left me 3 versions of the file: MP3 (192 kb/s), 16-bit and 32-bit. This took awhile, but I now see why. It included a "conversion" step, saying it was converting it to a 32-bit file (from what? I thought.the source file was already 32 bits). I meant to just let it analyzing an existing (gently mastered) file, but inadvertently let AAMS auto-master it instead. A file analysis on a 104 MB 32-bit wave file took about 5 minutes. One downside is that it's still agonizingly slow. There have been many UI improvements since I last looked at it, but it still does not score highly in terms of user-friendliness. ![]() Spurred by Mike's post, I've re-downloaded the free version, which is now at version 3. I'd tried this out (version 1) a few years ago, and although I wasn't exactly blown away, I have to say that it gets results at least comparable to LANDR, but with GOBS more helpful information provided. Just wanted to give this thread a bump, since it's apparently been greeted by yawns. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |